Newcastle outraged at FA’s decision not to punish Wigan’s McManaman for knee-high ‘horror’ tackle


Newcastle United has come out swinging.
The English Premier League club slammed a decision by the English Football Association on Tuesday for its failure to take disciplinary action against Wigan striker Callum McManaman after his horrific challenge on defender Massadio Haidara.
Most who witnessed the foul anticipated that McManaman would be charged with violent conduct when the FA reviewed his knee-high challenge in Sunday`s game.
The English Premier League club responded to the FA declaring the governing body’s disciplinary process was “not fit for purpose”.
Earlier in the day the FA had defended its decision of not taking retrospective action against McManaman with its own statement which declared it wanted to avoid what it called “re-refereeing”.
The announcement drew a quick response from the Magpies who were clearly astonished by the logic surrounding the decision:

“It is clear from this decision that the current disciplinary procedures are not fit for purpose. Newcastle United, along with other clubs, have had players suspended for incidents reviewed after the game. Whilst not trivialising these incidents, they were not, in our opinion, of the seriousness of Callum McManaman’s tackle on Haidara,” Newcastle Managing director Derek Llambias said in his statement.

The reaction to the decision captured headlines in major sports publications across England and the soccer world.
“FA give the middle finger to common sense”, The Daily Mail trumpeted while London newspaper The Times led their coverage with the headline “Newcastle up in arms after McManaman escapes ban.

Haidara was stretchered off the field in Sunday’s game. The studs-up, knee-high challenge made contact with Haida’s knee but wasn’t spotted by referee Mark Halsey and therefore McManaman went unpunished.
The Newcastle defender suffered suspected knee ligament damage on the play although an official injury report is still unavailable.
Referee Mark Halsey didn’t even award a free kick on the challenge while most observers expected an automatic red or yellow card to be awarded on the play.

Halsey told Newcastle coach Alan Pardrew at halftime that he never saw the tackle and therefore couldn’t have made a decision.
In its puzzling ruling on Tuesday, the FA indicated that the near-side linesman did see the foul so therefore no retrospective action could be taken against McManaman:

“Where one of the officials has seen a coming together of players, no retrospective action should be taken, regardless of whether he or she witnessed the full or particular nature of the challenge. This is to avoid the re-refereeing of incidents,” the FA statement read.
“In the case of McManaman, it has been confirmed that at least one of the match officials saw the coming together, though not the full extent of the challenge. In these circumstances retrospective action cannot be taken.”
The club also attacked the FA’s logic behind reaching its decision.
“Whilst we understand that the current procedures give the FA limited options, it cannot be correct that the most serious offences - those which have the potential to cause another player serious harm - can go unpunished, even if the original incident was seen by match officials,” the governing body said.

But the question still remains: If one of Halsey`s assistants spotted the play, why wasn’t the referee alerted to the seriousness of the foul with a raised flag or through their wireless communication devices?
In a stunning revelation also on Tuesday, ESPN and The Sun newspaper in England are reporting that Halsey has received death threats after the incident and is considering quitting his job.
The report also indicates Newcastle are could launch a law suit over the incident if Haida misses a significant time away from the game due to his injury.
Former EPL referee Graham Poll who writes a regular column with The Mail told TalkSport radio on Tuesday that Halsey should consider retirment.
“He’s been through a tough time in his life and no one wishes that on anyone. I just hope Mark looks at it and thinks: ‘Is it time? Is this a signal to go? Let’s bow out with some grace and dignity and go. It’s time for me to call it a day.'”
In an ironic twist of fate, The FA announced it will move forward with disciplinary action against Newcastle assistant coach John Carver.
Carver was ejected from the match after he confronted McManaman at halftime of Sunday’s game and needed to be restrained by Newcastle staff and match stewards.
Wigan coach Graham Barrow was also given his marching orders for his role in the confronation.
Carver and Newcastle have until Friday to issue a response to the FA’s charges.
RedCardTheRef would like have your opinion counted, so please take the time to vote in our latest poll:

Do you agree with the English Football Association's decision not to punish Callum McManaman for his knee-high tackle on Newcastle's Massadio Haidara?

  • Yes (10%, 25 Votes)
  • No (90%, 223 Votes)

Total Voters: 248

 Loading ...


Who is the EPL's worst referee?

  • Robert Madley (0%, 4 Votes)
  • Simon Beck (1%, 9 Votes)
  • Jonathan Moss (1%, 11 Votes)
  • Anthony Taylor (1%, 13 Votes)
  • Michael Oliver (2%, 14 Votes)
  • Mike Jones (2%, 15 Votes)
  • Roger East (2%, 15 Votes)
  • Neil Swarbrick (2%, 17 Votes)
  • Andre Marriner (3%, 28 Votes)
  • Lee Mason (4%, 34 Votes)
  • Lee Probert (4%, 34 Votes)
  • Martin Atkinson (4%, 39 Votes)
  • Mark Halsey (5%, 45 Votes)
  • Phil Dowd (8%, 68 Votes)
  • Mike Dean (8%, 70 Votes)
  • Kevin Friend (9%, 79 Votes)
  • Mark Clattenburg (18%, 161 Votes)
  • Chris Foy (30%, 265 Votes)
  • Howard Webb (31%, 276 Votes)

Total Voters: 877

 Loading ...

6 thoughts on “Newcastle outraged at FA’s decision not to punish Wigan’s McManaman for knee-high ‘horror’ tackle

  1. Part of me wonders what the decision would have been if Hairada had played for Manchester United. No don’t go there!

  2. The FA are a bunch of mainly old men who have never kicked a ball in anger, or otherwise. They operate behind rules which make no sense to anybody but themselves and dodge their responsibilities by using the bale out clauses which are conveniently written into their rules allowing them to be lenient when it suits and to hit hard when the fancy takes them. Neither the rules nor the FA can be described as fit for purpose when such a dangerous tackle as MnManaman’s can be allowed to go unpunished.

  3. I support neither of the teams in this Wigan:Newcastle debate, nor the Sunderland:Norwich game which also had farcical decisions in it, but I’m a football fan of some 55 years so I think I’m entitled to have a view as a “mere” fan. The FA’s posture is so out of touch with reality it beggars belief. We all know “Referees Assistants” just wave flags and wait for the referee to tell them which way to point it (watch any Division 1 game for proof). The plain, unadultereated fact is that anybody with 20:20 vision would instantly have screamed “Horrible Foul! Red Card!” Did the thug show any remorse? NO. Would he get away with that obscenity in Rugby? NO. And what we get is the FA saying that an official saw the offence and didn’t see it as a foul, so now the culprit is allowed to play on. His Chairman defends the villain and you charge the Newcastle coach with being a naughty boy because he wanted to express his view to the thug? You’ve lost any credibilty in my eyes FA. Your rules are rubbish if you carry on this way. You are ruining the game you purport to champion. Totally out of touch with the modern world, even that boring, slow game cricket is more switched on than you are. Their third official is watching the game on TV, and not having to act as an bouncer between two Managers and a time-keeper. What are you paying them? To deliver what? The lunatics are in charge of the asylum. An Utter Disgrace of The Highest Order.

  4. John Carver did not violently confront McManaman. He remonstrated with him. The ‘violence’ only started when Barrow pushed Carver away

    • Thanks for pointing this out s ransome - we reviewed the footage of the halftime incident again and have realized you are correct. We have also ammended the story to reflect this.

  5. Pochettino of Southampton walked onto the pitch at the end of the Norwich:Southampton game and asked Clattenburg to explain why he gave a penalty for an alleged foul by Shaw on Holt. Southampton players surrounded Clattenburg and remonstrated with him. The FA deemed that the club was “not in control of it’s players” and, even though Pochettino apologised immediately, the club was fined £20,000. I guess Clattenburg put it in his match report that he felt threatened by this - but he didn’t wave a red card, so it wasn’t serious? A day later, Carver gets sent to the stands and subsequently fined for something similar (without any pushing and shoving which, in my eyes, seemed to come from the Wigan guy and their stewards). Carver, expect a fine any day now. Rub some salt into Newcastle’s wounds why don’t you?

    I watched the Wigan:Newcastle game on Sky and heard the victim scream in pain when that thug McManaman smashed his studs into the boy’s leg, and then, to cap it off, followed through with a swipe on the other leg. Flag raised - for handball. How did the linesman not see that as a foul? Wasn’t the scream of pain and the subsequent lengthy delay in treating the victim enough of a clue to make any of the 4 officials think that something wrong has happened? What’s the point of them being “miked up” if they don’t ask each other questions?

    Another young thug gets away with a career-threatening tackle. And with the backing of his Chairman. And the tacit approval of his Manager (“youthful enthusiasm - his debut so trying to impress”). Well, he certainly made an impression - on a leg.

    I sincerely hope Wigan are relegated. What mild respect I had for their annual flirtation with relegation has now gone, they should drop down to the division where clogging is part of daily life, condoned by incompetent officials. The FA have lost the plot. They are equivalent to the traffic warden who delights in issuing a parking ticket because you and I have overstayed our alloted time by a minute but is incapable of dealing with the guy who drives his car at 40 in a 30 zone - “Didn’t see it, he was too fast”. Exactly - you know he was wrong but you didn’t see it the way the rest of the world did. Meantime, a young man is in hospital. I hope Newcastle sue Wigan for damages. Their video evidence is pretty conclusive.

Comments are closed.